To understand why this is false, you must understand how involuntary psychiatric holds actually work.

When someone is brought to a hospital under a mental health reason, the process starts with triage. Triage is a rapid safety assessment based heavily on the reported reason for admission. What police, EMS, or third parties say at this stage is treated as fact for the purpose of assigning a care category. Triage is not a diagnostic evaluation. It is about immediate safety and basic medical stabilization.

After triage, there may be a brief screening by mental health staff or volunteers. This screening, often a short questionnaire, also relies on third party accounts. If there is perceived risk, the person may be placed on a 72 hour involuntary hold at an inpatient facility. This hold is meant for observation and basic care, not formal diagnosis.

If transferred to inpatient care, as I was to UHS for three days, the patient typically meets with a physician for a short medication review and symptom check. There is no comprehensive psychological testing. ICD-10 codes assigned at intake are often repeated at discharge without independent verification.

In my case, a third party falsely reported I had bipolar disorder. That claim was entered at triage and carried through in paperwork. No clinician performed testing or confirmed the diagnosis. Since then, multiple independent, licensed evaluators have confirmed my correct diagnosis is PTSD, not bipolar disorder.

Katherine ignores these facts and presents a declaration written by my attorney as proof I am bipolar. This declaration was to show the court that I was in compliance with medical treatment shortly after discharge from UHS. My lawyer chose the word “diagnosed with” as shorthand to the point that I was in compliance with treatment. Katherine knows her republication of this declaration section is a distortion. She is counting on the public’s lack of understanding of the hold process to make the lie sound credible. I have had many mental health assessments and psychological evaluations that disagree with UHS and Katie since 2020. I was diagnosed with PTSD in 2021 and 2024 with many times before and after, it would be exhaustive to include the entire timeline that documents this. Please note that the diagnosis went from PTSD F43.10 to F43.9 due to ongoing trauma and harassment. 

Further deconstruction can be found on the Pink Slip blog.

A certified evaluator reviewed my history in 2024 using the ASAM criteria and concluded: no history of substance misuse, and no treatment services needed. The evaluator also noted the Fairfax medical records contained contradictory errors, including a missing Substance Use Disorder Assessment that would have been required for any valid diagnosis. This missing assessment nullifies any claim of a substance use disorder. Additionally, multiple other assessments spanning over the past 5 years have concluded I have no substance use disorder. 

Read Pink Slip for the full story.

This is a blatant falsehood. I currently have legal custody of my children and share physical custody equally with their father. Claims stating otherwise are entirely fabricated and are intended solely to damage my credibility and character. Spreading misinformation about custody is harmful and reckless, especially when it involves my children’s well-being. This lie is a clear attempt to undermine me personally and professionally by weaponizing private family matters. I will not be linking evidence as it is NOBODY’S business what is happening with custody over my minor children. Any seal I sought was to protect my children’s privacy rights as their selected rights guardian advocate. I would have to question any parent that does not understand this.

Read A Pattern for the full story.

There is no record or statement from me claiming that Katie directly caused my arrest. What I have stated is that Katie’s actions contributed to a situation which eventually led to my arrest. It is important to note that the charges against me were dismissed with prejudice, which means the case was permanently closed. Furthermore, Katie’s decision to publicly share and dox these highly inaccurate arrest records was done with malicious intent to defame me. This action is not only unethical, but it sets a bad precedence of behavior within a community of trauma survivors.

Read Fiction v. Facts for further explanation.

This accusation is completely fabricated and absurd. What I have stated and documented is that Katie deliberately locked me and other co-founders out of our Breaking Code Silence accounts, deleted valuable intellectual property, and held critical IP hostage. These are verifiable actions, and they caused significant harm to the organization and its mission. Katie’s refusal to address these actions honestly, combined with her spreading baseless claims about hacking and CIA involvement, is a deliberate attempt to confuse the narrative and evade accountability. She has never provided any proof to support her allegations. This distortion of facts is yet another tactic to distract from her own misconduct and to smear my reputation.

Read The Split and BCS 2.0 for the full story.

LOL. Insanity.

Katie Mac did not build the largest TTI database. Advocates and activists have been collecting data on the troubled teen industry for decades, much of it publicly accessible through forums like Fornits, Reddit, Wikipedia, personal blogs, and archive websites like WWASPSurvivors.com. When she began volunteering with WWASP Survivors, it was to help expand their database, not to originate one.

I personally contributed significant research, including academic studies, investigative findings, and systemic analysis. What began as a collaboration within WWASP Survivors later moved into Breaking Code Silence, where many others also shared their personal archives to support the group’s mission. I personally spent hundreds of hours organizing documents, analyzing data, identifying trends and making reports to authorities based on that data collection.

During the BCS split, Katherine cut off access to shared organizing spaces and research groups. She then took the collective data into the new Breaking Code Silence organization she created and later carried the same material over to Unsilenced. She has since watermarked all of this content for Unsilenced, often cropping out website headers and copyright claims, including on the personal testimonies of survivors. She gives no acknowledgment to the original contributors and instead claims total ownership of work that was built through collaboration. This is another example of her ongoing pattern of predatory conversion.

This accusation is a deliberate manipulation of facts. Katie Mac launched smear campaigns, spread rumors, and engaged in harassment to conceal her predatory takeover of Breaking Code Silence. She financed and initiated legal action against the original creators while misrepresenting the origins and purpose of an advocacy movement. When her efforts collapsed, she repeated the same pattern by crying victim and fueling another online smear campaign.

Katie’s behavior follows a consistent cycle. Her hostile and aggressive actions generate conflict, then she recasts herself as the injured party. The damage she points to is not evidence of victimization, but the direct result of the harm she set in motion.

Katherine’s creation of a website publishing manipulated family court documents is not harmless. It is targeted harassment. It is designed to isolate me socially, damage my reputation professionally, and intimidate me into silence.

Outdated family court documents are a tool of control in abusive situations. They are used to create a public record that looks official but tells a false story. By locating and republishing these, Katherine is engaging in stalking and coordinated bullying. She is also signaling to others in the community that it is acceptable to weaponize mental health stigma in personal disputes.

Page one of her site states she will take it down if I were to issue a public apology and release her from liability. This is privacy extortion with punishment attached. It is an aggressive and hostile action.

Read Protection Order for the full story.

To understand why this is false, you must understand how involuntary psychiatric holds actually work.

When someone is brought to a hospital under a mental health reason, the process starts with triage. Triage is a rapid safety assessment based heavily on the reported reason for admission. What police, EMS, or third parties say at this stage is treated as fact for the purpose of assigning a care category. Triage is not a diagnostic evaluation. It is about immediate safety and basic medical stabilization.

After triage, there may be a brief screening by mental health staff or volunteers. This screening, often a short questionnaire, also relies on third party accounts. If there is perceived risk, the person may be placed on a 72 hour involuntary hold at an inpatient facility. This hold is meant for observation and basic care, not formal diagnosis.

If transferred to inpatient care, as I was to UHS for three days, the patient typically meets with a physician for a short medication review and symptom check. There is no comprehensive psychological testing. ICD-10 codes assigned at intake are often repeated at discharge without independent verification.

In my case, a third party falsely reported I had bipolar disorder. That claim was entered at triage and carried through in paperwork. No clinician performed testing or confirmed the diagnosis. Since then, multiple independent, licensed evaluators have confirmed my correct diagnosis is PTSD, not bipolar disorder.

Katherine ignores these facts and presents a declaration written by my attorney as proof I am bipolar. This declaration was to show the court that I was in compliance with medical treatment shortly after discharge from UHS. My lawyer chose the word “diagnosed with” as shorthand to the point that I was in compliance with treatment. Katherine knows her republication of this declaration section is a distortion. She is counting on the public’s lack of understanding of the hold process to make the lie sound credible. I have had many mental health assessments and psychological evaluations that disagree with UHS and Katie since 2020. I was diagnosed with PTSD in 2021 and 2024 with many times before and after, it would be exhaustive to include the entire timeline that documents this. Please note that the diagnosis went from PTSD F43.10 to F43.9 due to ongoing trauma and harassment. 

Further deconstruction can be found on the Pink Slip blog.

A certified evaluator reviewed my history in 2024 using the ASAM criteria and concluded: no history of substance misuse, and no treatment services needed. The evaluator also noted the Fairfax medical records contained contradictory errors, including a missing Substance Use Disorder Assessment that would have been required for any valid diagnosis. This missing assessment nullifies any claim of a substance use disorder. Additionally, multiple other assessments spanning over the past 5 years have concluded I have no substance use disorder. 

Read Pink Slip for the full story.

This is a blatant falsehood. I currently have legal custody of my children and share physical custody equally with their father. Claims stating otherwise are entirely fabricated and are intended solely to damage my credibility and character. Spreading misinformation about custody is harmful and reckless, especially when it involves my children’s well-being. This lie is a clear attempt to undermine me personally and professionally by weaponizing private family matters. I will not be linking evidence as it is NOBODY’S business what is happening with custody over my minor children. Any seal I sought was to protect my children’s privacy rights as their selected rights guardian advocate. I would have to question any parent that does not understand this.

Read A Pattern for the full story.

There is no record or statement from me claiming that Katie directly caused my arrest. What I have stated is that Katie’s actions contributed to a situation which eventually led to my arrest. It is important to note that the charges against me were dismissed with prejudice, which means the case was permanently closed. Furthermore, Katie’s decision to publicly share and dox these highly inaccurate arrest records was done with malicious intent to defame me. This action is not only unethical, but it sets a bad precedence of behavior within a community of trauma survivors.

Read Fiction v. Facts for further explanation.

This accusation is completely fabricated and absurd. What I have stated and documented is that Katie deliberately locked me and other co-founders out of our Breaking Code Silence accounts, deleted valuable intellectual property, and held critical IP hostage. These are verifiable actions, and they caused significant harm to the organization and its mission. Katie’s refusal to address these actions honestly, combined with her spreading baseless claims about hacking and CIA involvement, is a deliberate attempt to confuse the narrative and evade accountability. She has never provided any proof to support her allegations. This distortion of facts is yet another tactic to distract from her own misconduct and to smear my reputation.

Read The Split and BCS 2.0 for the full story.

LOL. Insanity.

Katie Mac did not build the largest TTI database. Advocates and activists have been collecting data on the troubled teen industry for decades, much of it publicly accessible through forums like Fornits, Reddit, Wikipedia, personal blogs, and archive websites like WWASPSurvivors.com. When she began volunteering with WWASP Survivors, it was to help expand their database, not to originate one.

I personally contributed significant research, including academic studies, investigative findings, and systemic analysis. What began as a collaboration within WWASP Survivors later moved into Breaking Code Silence, where many others also shared their personal archives to support the group’s mission. I personally spent hundreds of hours organizing documents, analyzing data, identifying trends and making reports to authorities based on that data collection.

During the BCS split, Katherine cut off access to shared organizing spaces and research groups. She then took the collective data into the new Breaking Code Silence organization she created and later carried the same material over to Unsilenced. She has since watermarked all of this content for Unsilenced, often cropping out website headers and copyright claims, including on the personal testimonies of survivors. She gives no acknowledgment to the original contributors and instead claims total ownership of work that was built through collaboration. This is another example of her ongoing pattern of predatory conversion.

This accusation is a deliberate manipulation of facts. Katie launched smear campaigns, spread rumors, and engaged in harassment to conceal her predatory takeover of Breaking Code Silence. She financed and initiated legal action against the original creators while misrepresenting the origins and purpose of an advocacy movement. When her efforts collapsed, she repeated the same pattern by crying victim and fueling another online smear campaign.

Katie’s behavior follows a consistent cycle. Her hostile and aggressive actions generate conflict, then she recasts herself as the injured party. The damage she points to is not evidence of victimization, but the direct result of the harm she set in motion.

Katherine’s creation of a website publishing manipulated family court documents is not harmless. It is targeted harassment. It is designed to isolate me socially, damage my reputation professionally, and intimidate me into silence.

Outdated family court documents are a tool of control in abusive situations. They are used to create a public record that looks official but tells a false story. By locating and republishing these, Katherine is engaging in stalking and coordinated bullying. She is also signaling to others in the community that it is acceptable to weaponize mental health stigma in personal disputes.

Page one of her site states she will take it down if I were to issue a public apology and release her from liability. This is privacy extortion with punishment attached. It is an aggressive and hostile action.

Read Protection Order for the full story.